All Posts Tagged ‘Perception

Post

Observing

14 comments

 

 

When most people are observing an animal, they are really not (usually) seeing purely without contamination.  They usually are looking with (and “as”) images and labels of the organism… images and labels that are constantly being modified, changed, added to, and rearranged.  Their seeing is not pure seeing per se but is more a part of a process of categorization, image-recognition, and processing.

When most people observe, there is a separative space between the perceiver and the perceived.   In a very wise mind, however, in pure observing, there is no separate perceiver merely categorizing, merely engaging in image-recognition, and processing… and there is no separative space involved.  Perception beyond learned accumulation does not merely continue to contribute to a learned accumulative process.  Deep perception, then, is not merely reacting but, instead, is something entirely different.  Profound perception is far deeper than mere superficial reacting.  Real perception involves completeness, non-fragmentation, and timelessness.   That may be what real mindfulness, real meditation consists of… and not all of that childish, practiced, self-hypnotic stuff.

Perception immersed only with (and “as”) reaction and accumulation is incapable of great depth and profundity.  Perception beyond mere reactions and accumulative processes is immense and profound.   Looking as a totally separate “perceiver” isolates and separates in a very crude and barbaric way.   A man who, as a separate perceiver, is looking at “his fear” tends to see that fear from a separative distance, even though, in reality, he actually is the fear (not something separate from it at any distance whatsoever).  Ignorance must end for true psychological order to exist.  Only true psychological order can really be mindful in the deepest sense.  Unintelligence, false (learned) separation, and a lack of compassion are all one pitiful thing.

 

 

Observing Photo by Thomas Peace c. 2018

Post

Pristine Perception

8 comments

 

Pristine perception is beyond the limited; if it is very limited, it is not pristine perception.  Such perception goes beyond the fragmented, limited labels that people assign to things.  Such labels, however “accurate” they may seem, are always partial, circumscribed, and merely symbolic.  Symbols are not actualities.  The word “water” isn’t wet.  Their essence may hold aspects of reality, but they may not be of actual truth whatsoever.  Mostpeople cling to symbols and sequential conceptual terms; without them, they (i.e., mostpeople) are lost.  Wisdom goes beyond this, and what is sees is far from ordinary. 

Depression and melancholiness, worldwide, are rampant in people these days.  A lot of the problem deals with the fact that they were primarily educated to merely exist and remain as symbolic thought (and all thought is merely symbolic).  Being one symbol after another, in sequence, creates an atmosphere that can, indeed, be depressed or of melancholiness.  Even when many chase after exciting experiences, these experiences are usually seen through (or “as”) a screen of symbolic interpretation and label-oriented imagery; then, it ends up being an extension of more and more symbols, which are intrinsically not what is fundamentally whole and pristine.  It is very easy to get lost because of poor education.  It is not so easy to perceive the danger of the false and go beyond it.

 

 

 

Mating Monarchs (1) Photo by Thomas Peace c. 2017

Mating Monarchs (2) Photo by Thomas Peace c. 2017

Post

Within the camera eye…

12 comments

It is good to be perceptive, to be observant.  Many of us, who take photographs and share them, reveal certain detailed (and often unique) perceptions that we have… (that we are appreciative of).  To be perceptive is to be sensitive.  Even our cameras have a certain innate, intrinsic sensitivity, wherein they pick up (and convey) many of the intricacies that a scene or area displays.  To be a real human being, however, calls for much more sensitivity than what a mechanical camera is capable of.  Interestingly, there are many people who go through existence being perceptive in more of a mechanical, mechanistic, camera-like way.  They focus upon what others have directed them to focus upon; they capture (and hold) what they were developed to capture and hold.  Like digital cameras, they store the data and their depth is artificial; they assimilate and grasp according to the way they were programmed.  Their stored data depends exclusively upon imprinted patterns.

A truly insightful and reflective human being, on the other hand, may go far beyond a mere mechanical, superficial existence.  The depth of a truly insightful, reflective human being would be amazingly real and beyond mere simulation.  Real sensitivity has tremendous depth.  That depth and real love/real living may not be different things.  That depth shatters the separation between the viewer and the image.  That sensitivity helps others in profound ways (that are not merely what can be photographed… although photographing may be part of how that sensitivity shares).  That sensitivity penetrates far deeper than what any mechanical device can calculatingly and premeditatively (artificially) capture.

Last night, this movement was observing a science program on television concerning the universe.  A lot of top scientists were talking about where the universe was going.  They said that there is absolutely no evidence that there exists any eternity in the universe and that it is more than likely that everything will disappear entirely (and that is that).   Unfortunately, they don’t understand what certain wise individuals understand; they (to a very large extent) don’t understand their own minds, and they don’t know what most of the cosmos (such as dark energy) consists of.  If a mindlenscamera is constructed and programmed by the superficial, what it picks up and captures (to share) will often be rather superficial.  Sometimes superficial and two-dimensional is very nice and excellent to visit… but one wouldn’t want to exclusively live there.  Superficial snapshots from distortion impress most who are truly discerning and deep (only to a limited extent).  As for those scientists, well, unfortunately, they are very good at capturing and conveying what they’ve discovered from limitation.

So, what transforms beyond the limited focus of the camera-i… is real integrity.  Real, living integrity comes about only when the mind naturally becomes orderly beyond some dead blueprint or formulated mold.  When real integrity comes about, the universe and its deepest magic comes to you; you don’t have to seek it.  True integrity, which is wholeness, allows for (that deep order which is the entire universe) to flower within.  That brings true bliss and enlightenment.  The limited camera-i cannot do it, for what it perceives is little, separate snapshots here and there (according to some limited, manufactured programming).   When real wisdom occurs, then the camera-i doesn’t merely try to capture things (with what it focuses on)… because then its instrument is not separate from all the mystery that takes place in the world (and all the mystery that is beyond place).

Tree Frog on brownish house siding (blending in quite nicely). Photo by Thomas Peace c. 2015

Tree Frog on brownish house siding (blending in quite nicely). Photo by Thomas Peace c. 2015